Cross-pollination worries compel Supes to downsize hemp farming


Daniel Mintz
Mad River Union

HUMBOLDT – A mapped hemp farming zone incorporates six,000 acres of the higher Arcata region but it is now off the table as county supervisors are focusing on smaller sized-scale medicinal hemp production.

​The ongoing debate on how to regulate hemp continued at the Nov. 19 Board of Supervisors meeting. Up for consideration was an ordinance banning hemp cultivation and its manufacturing, processing and distribution.

​The Arranging Commission had unanimously voted to propose that but supervisors had been wary of taking the all-encompassing action. They’re supportive of extending a short-term moratorium solely on hemp cultivation when additional function is performed on building regulations.

​During a public comment session, lots of speakers pointed out that hemp is the exact same plant as cannabis but is differentiated by its trace quantity of THC.  

​Cross-pollination due to the presence of male plants is the major concern of cannabis farmers and Ross Gordon, the policy director of the Humboldt Growers Alliance (HGA), summed up the situation as a query of scale.

​“You can verify for male plants when you are on five,000 or 10,000 square feet but checking for male plants on 100 acres is a distinctive story,” he mentioned, adding that significant-scale hemp farming has triggered the “big meltdowns” from cross-pollination noticed in Southern Oregon and Colorado.

​He mentioned that is why HGA opposes permitting industrial-scale cultivation of hemp in the county. The association is “neutral” on tiny-scale hemp cultivation.

​Joshua Hanna, CEO of Humboldt CBD and Humboldt Hemp Incorporated, believes regulation really should hone in on the aspect of hemp cultivation that men and women are most concerned about.

​“If cross-pollination is the key concern concerning hemp then we really should shift the conversation toward regulating male cannabis plants in basic – each hemp and marijuana,” he mentioned. “Strains of cannabis which do not include THC and classify as hemp are not the challenge, male plants are the challenge when it comes to pollination.”

​He added that a tradition of hemp cultivation runs deep in the county and “fighting female hemp farming in Humboldt County is fighting one thing historic that started right here.”

Hemp cultivation can – and does – happen beneath the county’s current industrial cannabis ordinance but it is a reduced-worth solution than THC-wealthy cannabis, therefore the bigger scale of production. 

Increasing it beneath present permit circumstances is viable but it is much less profit with the exact same fees and taxation.

​County employees had envisioned a 28,000-acre Industrial Hemp Management Zone created up of significant-tract farmlands. But supervisors showed interest in accommodating smaller sized-scale CBD hemp producers.

​They will take additional time to create a regulatory strategy. “At the incredibly minimum, we have to do a moratorium till we know far better,” mentioned Supervisor Estelle Fennell.  

​She desires to make confident farming practices and prevention of environmental harm are controlled. “I do not know what level of handle we’d have for one thing that was truly meant for creating items and other classic hemp items,” she mentioned.

Supervisors will vote on extending the county’s current hemp moratorium on Dec. 10 and are supportive of undertaking so, for a year. 

In the meantime, they decided to go with 1 of the options to an outright ban, which is to have employees take into consideration the county’s basic cannabis regulations and “determine if there are regulatory barriers which preclude tiny farmers from entry into the legal industry spot.”



Latest posts